Suppose and are two unbiasedestimator of a given populations' parameter
We say that is relatively more efficient than if
The relative efficiency is used to measure the efficiency of relative to
Suppose , ,
Both are unbiased:
And the variances:
For some estimators, their variances are difficult to calculate, so we may focus on their lower bound to determine to find the most optimal one.
The efficiency of an unbiased estimator of is the ratio of the CRLB of the variance of the estimator
just as how in Unbiasedness calculations we compare it to the mean
The best ratio is 1, where
If is unbiased for , and , then is asymptotically efficient, as
If is an unbiased estimator for () and the variance of attains (is equal to) the value of the Cramér-Rao inequality, then is the uniformly minimum variance unbiased estimator (UMVUE) for , and is optimally efficient
Comparing from the earlier example:
So is the UMVUE for this estimator (best in this category)